Distance restricted manipulation in voting
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce the notion of Distance Restricted Manipulation, where colluding manipulator(s) need to compute if there exist votes which make their preferred alternative win election when knowledge about others' is a little inaccurate. use Kendall-Tau distance model manipulators' confidence in non-manipulators' votes. To this end, we study problem two settings - one manipulators manipulating vote that succeeds irrespective perturbations (Distance Pessimistic Manipulation), and second for at least possible profile others Optimistic Manipulation). show Manipulation admits polynomial-time algorithms every scoring rule, maximin, Bucklin, simplified Bucklin voting rules single manipulator, k-approval rule any number manipulators, but becomes intractable Copelandα α∈[0,1] even manipulator. In contrast, almost all common rules, with exception plurality rule. For constant alternatives, both problems are solvable anonymous efficient
منابع مشابه
Restricted Manipulation in Iterative Voting: Convergence and Condorcet Efficiency
In collective decision making, where a voting rule is used to take a collective decision among a group of agents, manipulation by one or more agents is usually considered negative behavior to be avoided, or at least to be made computationally difficult for the agents to perform. However, there are scenarios in which a restricted form of manipulation can instead be beneficial. In this paper we c...
متن کاملRestricted Manipulation in Iterative Voting: Condorcet Efficiency and Borda Score
In collective decision making, where a voting rule is used to take a collective decision among a group of agents, manipulation by one or more agents is usually considered negative behavior to be avoided, or at least to be made computationally difficult for the agents to perform. However, there are scenarios in which a restricted form of manipulation can instead be beneficial. In this paper we c...
متن کاملBarriers to Manipulation in Voting
Example 6.1 Consider an election with three alternatives, a, b, and c, and three voters, 1, 2, and 3. Suppose the rule used is plurality—an alternative gets a point each time it is ranked first by a voter, and the alternative with the most points wins—with ties broken towards alternatives earlier in the alphabet. Suppose voter 3 knows (or strongly suspects) that voter 1 will rank a first in her...
متن کاملStrategic Manipulation in Voting Systems
In this thesis, we are going to study the strategic manipulation of voting rules, mostly scoring rules. In the first part, we focus on naive manipulation, where we have a coalition of manipulators and the other voters vote sincerely. In Section 1.4 we introduce a new measure of manipulability of voting rules, which reflects both the size and the prevalence of the manipulating coalitions and is ...
متن کاملManipulation in Voting: Strategic Voting and Strategic Nomination
In this paper the concepts of manipulation as strategic voting (misrepresentation of true preferences) and strategic nomination (by adding, or removing alternatives) are investigated. The connection between Arrow’s and Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorems is discussed from the viewpoint of dilemma between dictatorship and manipulability.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Theoretical Computer Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1879-2294', '0304-3975']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2021.08.034